| Professionalism includes
diversity training and justice. For our nation to truly have
“justice for all,” diversity awareness and training must
include another category. Nothing compares to the
misunderstanding and discrimination facing this group.
Persecution is so likely, that most in this huge class of
citizens, do not even tell their closest friends about their
area of diversity. It is a common, treatable medical
diagnosis, affecting one in five Americans, from children to
seniors. These masses share common, treatable brain
illnesses, and are referred to as the “mentally ill.” So
why aren’t these mentally ill citizens, and the
discrimination they live with, included in diversity
workshops sponsored by our nation’s professionalism, ethics,
and equal opportunity organizations? They should be, and,
most likely, will be, as national jurisprudence comes to
include “mental illness awareness.”
The wheels of justice turn slowly. In February of 2001
the Florida Supreme Court launched what may be a quiet,
polite, courtroom-based civil rights movement for those 27
million Americans who have mental illnesses. The Court added
“mental illness awareness” to the mandatory category of CLE
courses - equal to ethics, professionalism, and substance
abuse. This followed the unanimous support of the 1999 Board
of Governors, in responding to a petition brought by over
fifty Florida Bar members, pursuant to Rule 1-12.1 Amendment
to Rules (1997).
Presently, mentally ill Americans are not organized as an
advocacy or lobbying force. Instead, our society’s ignorance
and resulting discrimination keep these people shamefully
hiding their diagnoses, feeling defenseless and oppressed.
Years of one-sided news coverage has contributed to the
unfairness and prejudice. The media has for decades reported
only the vilest acts by the most seriously deluded, as
being representative of the mentally ill.
All the while, millions of mentally ill people have been
leading normal lives, either stabilized on medications, or
having only mild, rare cycles or periods of symptoms.
Headlines never mentioned the mental illness diagnosis of
the many successful, productive individuals. Labeling a
person mentally “ill” for life, after a single brief episode
of illness, reflects the injustice. That people recover is
never disclosed. Consequently, the public has never learned
that they have been surrounded daily by, working with, and
socializing with people with common mental illnesses.
Our society has advanced greatly in its medical
understanding of neuroscience and biochemistry over the last
decade. The recovery rates can be as high as 80%, when early
diagnosis and proper medical treatment are provided.
However, our society does not teach people to recognize the
illnesses quickly. The symptoms become more severe with
time, the longer they are not treated. Many of the mentally
ill who are not medically treated, eventually turn to
substance abuse to find relief for unpleasant symptoms.
These symptoms often last for weeks at a time, without
medical intervention. As many as 50% of the mentally ill
abuse substances. Many end up in jails or prisons. An
educated bench and bar will consider the medical nature of
behaviors, and order proper treatment, structuring sentences
to promote recovery and health.
Mental illness is a health problem with great legal,
economic, and safety factors. Tragic and dangerous mental
illnesses are the preventable causes which lead thousands of
people to suicide or murder-suicides. Depression [and
bipolar] recognition and treatment will prevent suicides -
the third leading cause of death in our teenagers, aged
14-19.
Lawyers and judges have new tools to help restore health,
safety, wealth, and fairness to our nation through providing
justice for the mentally ill. The U.S. Surgeon General’s
mental health report of 1999, the children’s mental health
report of 2001, and numerous other online information sites
provide: descriptions of the illnesses; evidence
based-models for treatment and recovery; and explanations of
many societal problems related to non-treatment of mental
illnesses.
Not having been provided with training about the cycles,
the genetics, and the stress triggers of mental illnesses,
lawyers and judges have been winging it. Their presumptions
have frequently followed inaccurate societal views. Often
clients or witnesses with a diagnosis of a mental disorder
had their credibility doubted simply because of their
diagnosis. The uneducated may have thought that this was
merited because, after all, the person was “crazy.” Few are
aware of the many famous and accomplished people who live or
lived with a diagnosis of mental illness. Biased coverage
continues this one-sided, inaccurate view of a huge class of
Americans.
Prejudice and attitudes based upon misinformation and
misunderstanding have plagued the masses who have brain
disorders for years. Jurors have found defendants guilty
without hearing anything about how the defendant’s behaviors
mirrored a diagnosable brain illness, which was clearly
inherited from a parent. It has been presumed that all
behaviors were willful and intentional. This is not the case
with brain illnesses. Just as a person does not choose to
have diabetes, allergies, or asthma, a person does not
choose to have a manic episode or suicidal depression, and
the associated symptoms.
More injustice has occurred in the family courts, when
the legal community has no training about brain illnesses.
Presumptions of unfitness to parent [or even to visit one’s
child], presumptions of medication noncompliance, and of
conclusions of bad parenting [as opposed to a child’s
behavior being an inherited brain illness with behavioral
problems] are often based on prejudice. Children have been
wrongfully cut off from a mentally ill parent. This causes
great stress on a child that may likely have inherited the
parent’s same stress-triggered brain illness. Such a
traumatizing event, as losing one’s parent, may be
sufficient stress to trigger the onset of mental illness in
the child. Both injustice and harm to a child’s health can
be the consequence of an uneducated legal community.
In employment law, some lawyers have even advised clients
to restructure corporate roles. Mentally ill employees were
placed in corporations of fewer than 15, so Americans with
Disabilities Act rights were denied. Without a trained bench
and bar, how are these persecuted employees, and those
facing other injustices, ever able to assert their legal and
Constitutional rights to “justice for all”?
There have been no strong coalitions of mentally ill
Americans demanding justice. Who would dare face a lifetime
of prejudice by revealing their diagnosis? The problems,
like all diversity problems, span all areas of legal
practice. There are great opportunities for prevention of
substance abuse, crime, incarcerations, domestic violence,
divorces, and suicides. The economic savings in juvenile and
criminal justice alone will go a long way toward offsetting
the cost of education and medical treatment. Recovery can
bring stable marriages, with employed parents paying taxes
and supporting healthy children and a healthy economy.
Justice demands that the legal community rapidly learn
about this topic. It is the professional thing to do.
Suicide kills lawyers too. After several suicides, the North
Carolina Bar Association’s 1990 survey found that 12 percent
of their lawyers admitted to contemplating suicide at least
once a month for the last several months. Mental illnesses
are real and treatable. Ignorance and misinformation is the
problem. By welcoming this area to the field of diversity
and professionalism, greater education will do much to
improve the health, wealth, safety, and justice for all
Americans. |